Hi guys i started studying corporate finance from.but it seems is indeed missing a lot of concepts. EgWorking capital mgmt chap- it misses a hell lot of portion in comparison to curriculum The formula for Float factor was missing in. Also in share repurchases chapter.a lot of share repurchases important theory was missing in also in leverage chapter.operating breakeven concept was missing. Now i feel is truly not enoughhence resorting to curriculum fast reading i feel is gud only for number crunching numericals and not for conceptual understanding. I would be helpful if you guys point out the concepts missing in. Is gud only for number crunching which wouldnt be solely helpful for passing the exams.hence i am changing ships from to elan.elan is much much better than it not only emphasis on numbers but makes theory pretty simple.reading curriculum and retaining till the exam would be pretty difficult.and i am losing time too.so the best option to change ships. @ rayank.i dont encourage reading curriculum in march.hence changing ships. @ i will pass.Qbank is of.IMO qbank wouldnt incude concepts which are missing in. Hey guys please post the missing parts from in other subjects. I-will-pass wrote: Rayankh my friend, imo you should pass L1 before giving good sounding advice to the world;) I am not giving advice to the world as if my advice is the only solution. OP was concerned that was missing a lot of material, so the solution is quite simple. CFA Level 1 Corporate Finance: A discussion of the Weighted Average Cost of. Information on what you NEED to know to PASS the 2013 Level 1 CFA exam. If you had planned to use because it it a huge time saver (especially if you have business/finance background as I do), I do not think switching over the curriculum books is necessary just because you are afraid of what it is missing. All you have to do is check very simply (takes about 10 minutes extra for each reading) whether material covered all the topics that the CFA Institute covered. To me, it’s not worth the time reading the curriculum which many times provides way too much detail. Instead, focus on the important and necessary aspects which does a fairly good job of presenting, and then figure out if there were any gaps. I feel if I can answer all of the curriculum’s blue box and EOC questions correctly and thoroughly understand my reasoning, I would say that did an adequate job. Also, I plan on finishing my studied in the second week of April for this very reason. I will dedicate the remainder of the time going through Qbank, practice/sample exams and redoing all of the EOC questions. This will inform me of where I need to strengthen. In my opinion, it would be a waste of time devoting much more time going through the very meticulous curriculum material only to need to fill your head with more than is necessary (harder to remember everything) and still need to revise with less time. Game gba format gba games. Keep in mind, this is coming from a Finance undergrad, so a lot is review and even the new material I am able to understand relatively quickly because of the background knowledge. IMHO– was good enough for me to pass Levels 1 and 2. I did not once open a CFAI book for Level 1, and and for Level 2, I only did the EOC questions. Remember–you have a limited amount of “hard-drive space” in your brain.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |